**Philosophy Index** is a site devoted to the study of philosophy
and the philosophers who conduct it. The site contains a number of philosophy texts,
brief biographies, and introductions to philosophers, and explanations on a
number of topics. Accredited homeschooling online
at Northgate Academy and Philosophy online tutoring.

Philosophy Index is a work in progress, a growing repository of knowledge. It outlines current philosophical problems and issues, as well as an overview of the history of philosophy. The goal of this site is to present a tool for those learning philosophy either casually or formally, making the concepts of philosophy accessible to anyone interested in researching them. WTI offers immigration law course online - fully accredited. ACE credits online at EES.

**Aristotle****Camus****Descartes****Frege****Heidegger****Hobbes****Hume****Kant****Kierkegaard****Locke****Nietzsche****Plato****Quine****Russell****Sartre****Socrates****Wittgenstein**- All Philosophers…

**Aesthetics****Epistemology****Logic****Ethics****Metaphysics****Language****Mind****Politics****TEST PREP KIT**- All Terms & Topics…

The exclusive disjunction is a truth-functional operator in logic which is equivalent to the English wording “either“ or”. It is used to express a disjunction in which the connected propositions or formulae cannot both be true.

For example, if P or Q are true, but not both, we may say formally:

**P ⊕ Q**

This may be read as “Either P or Q” or “it is the case that P or Q, but not both”.

In symbolic logic, the exclusive disjunction symbol ( ⊕ ) is used to symbolize this type of disjunction. Sometimes, the capitalized term XOR (meaning “exclusive or”) is used.

Some logical systems do not include the ⊕ symbol in their formal language. In these systems, exclusive disjunctions must be formulated using other operators. The following is an alternative expression of an exclusive disjunction:

**(P ∨ Q) ∧ ¬(P & Q)**

The following table illustrates the possible truth values of P ⊕ Q, given each possible valuation of its terms, P and Q. Note that unlike an inclusive disjunction, P ⊕ Q is true if, and only if, exactly one of its connected terms is true.

P | Q | P ⊕ Q |
---|---|---|

T | T | F |

T | F | T |

F | T | T |

F | F | F |